Eugene Linden
home   |   contact info   |   biography   |   publications   |   radio/tv   |   musings   |   short takes   

Latest Musing

A Nobel Prize in Economics a Climate Change Denier Might Love

It has been a scary month in climate science. Hurricane Michael and a frightening report from the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change underlined the potential costs of human-caused global warming. Then to add insult to injury, William Nordhaus won the economics Nobel Prize.

N...

continue

Latest Book

The Ragged Edge of the World
Buy from Amazon

more info

Articles by Category
endangered animals
rapid climate change
global deforestation
fragging

Books

Winds of Change
Buy from Amazon

more info
Afterword to the softbound edition.


The Octopus and the Orangutan
more info


The Future In Plain Sight
more info


The Parrot's Lament
more info


Silent Partners
more info


Affluence and Discontent
more info


The Alms Race
more info


Apes, Men, & Language
more info


center content

bio

             I’ve spent my entire writing career exploring various aspects of one question: Why is it that after hundreds of thousands of years one relatively small subset of our species has reached a point where its fears, appetites, and spending habits control the destiny of every culture, every major ecosystem, and virtually every creature on earth?  What happened that enabled us to seize control in a blink of an eye?

         I began scratching at this question in my first book, Apes, Men and Language, published nearly 40 years ago. In that book I explored the implications of some experiments from the 1960s  that showed that chimpanzees could use sign language in ways similar to the way we use words – to express opinions and feelings, to make specific requests, and to comment on the events of their day.  Since the moral basis of our rights to use nature as so much raw material is deeply entangled with the belief that we are the lone sentient beings on the planet, I wondered what it would mean if it turned out that other animals possessed higher mental abilities and consciousness? I never expected that the scientific establishment and society would say “oops, sorry,” but I also never imagined that the issue would turn out to be as fraught and contentious as it has.

         That first book was the result of a curious turn of events. My first major journalistic assignment was an investigation of fragging (attacks by enlisted men on their officers) in Vietnam. That article, “The Demoralization of an Army: Fragging and Other Withdrawal Symptoms,” was published as a cover story in Saturday Review in 1971. It got a good deal of attention, and a few publishers contacted me about possibly writing a book. I was eager to do that, but a few publishers lost interest when they learned that I wanted to write about experiments teaching sign language to apes and not Vietnam. Dutton gamely stayed on, however, and "Apes" is still in print in some parts of the world.

         Since that first book, I’ve revisited and explored animal thinking in several books and many articles. In Silent Partners: The Legacy of the Ape Language Experiments, I looked at what happened to the animals themselves in the aftermath of the experiments as the chimps were whipsawed by a society that shifted back and forth between treating them as personalities and commodities. I wrote articles for National Geographic, TIME, and Parade, among other publications about animal intelligence as the debate progressed at its glacial pace.

Then, in the 1990s, I had an epiphany of sorts. I’d heard a story about an orangutan that got hold of a piece of wire and used it to pick the lock on his cage, all the while hiding his efforts from the zookeepers. Here seemed to be a panoply of higher mental abilities on display, unprompted by any rewards from humans, and it occurred to me that, if animals could think, maybe they did their best thinking when it served their purposes, and not some human in a lab coat. Out of this flash came two more books, The Parrot's Lament: Tales of Animal Intrigue, Intelligence and Ingenuity, and, The Octopus and the Orangutan: More Tales of Animal Intrigue, Intelligence, and Ingenuity, as well as a few more articles for TIME, Parade, and Oprah among other publications. I’ve found this approach to thinking about animal intelligence both liberating and fun, and I intend to explore this a good deal more.

 

         The question of what makes us different than other creatures was but one aspect of my career-long efforts to understand how we have come to rule the planet. At the same time that I was exploring the question of higher mental abilities in animals I also began to think about how our notions our notions of our own specialness related to the consumer society. If intelligence, language and consciousness gave us dominion, it was the consumer society that gave us the tools to exploit nature for our own benefit. I’ve developed my thoughts on the nature and origins of consumer societies in four books, Affluence and Discontent: The Anatomy of Consumer Societies (1979), The Alms Race: The Impact of American Voluntary Aid Abroad (1976), The Future in Plain Sight: Nine Clues to the Coming Chaos (1998), and, most recently, The Ragged Edge of the World: Encounters at the Frontier Where Modernity, Wildlands and Indigenous Peoples Meet (2011), which tries to tell the story of the inexorable expansion of the consumer society through vignettes and stories.

 

         And then, of course, there are the consequences of our tendency to treat the planet as a cookie jar. This has been the dominant subject of my environmental journalism, which began as soon as I returned from Vietnam in 1971. Over the years, I have covered nearly every major environmental issue in publications ranging from Foreign Affairs to large circulation publications such as TIME and Parade. Sadly, journalistic effort of myself and many others have done little to slow the accelerating destruction of earth’s life support systems. Still, I’m proud that my TIME cover story on threats to the Ndoki, an ecological eden in the Congo, helped rally support for its protection, and that another TIME cover on the threatened extinction of the tiger in the wild proved useful in bringing pressure on China to reduce its role in the out of control poaching that supplied the traditional medicine market. Perhaps, I’m most proud of an article for Foreign Affairs, which I co-authored with Thomas Lovejoy and Daniel Phillips, which offered a blueprint for how to mobilize conservation efforts on a continental scale – something that urgently needed if vast ecosystems such as the Amazon and Congo rainforests are to be saved. My pride, however, has been tempered by the failure of this idea to gain any traction.

Over the years, it’s become clear that the threat of climate change trumps every conservation issue. The Ndoki has been saved from loggers, but the drying of northern Africa threatens to nullify this protection. Similarly, polar bears have been saved from the threat of uncontrolled hunting, but now have to cope with a warming arctic, which robs them of the sea ice from which they hunt ringed seals. I’ve written several articles and op-eds about various aspects of this existential threat as well as one book,The Winds of Change: Climate, Weather, and the Destruction of Civilizations, in which I tried to convey the scale of the threat by revisiting the role natural climate change has played in human evolution and the history of civilization.

 

In recent years, apart from my writing, I’ve pursued an active career in the world of finance, serving as chief investment strategist for Bennett Management, a family of funds that invests in distressed companies. I've also served on several corporate boards.

 

A selective list of my publications is available on this site under the title, “Publications,” and I append to this narrative a more traditional bio, which organizes my writings and activities by topic.

 

                                  EUGENE LINDEN 

 

WRITING:

 

         Social Criticism and Current Affairs:

         Books:

         The Ragged Edge of the World: Encounters at the Frontier Where Modernity, Wildlands and Indigenous Peoples Meet. Viking, April 2011. Plume, April 2012. The Future in Plain Sight: Nine Clues to the Coming Chaos.  Simon & Schuster, August 1998. Reissued, Plume, Jan. 2002. Affluence and Discontent: The Anatomy of Consumer Societies. Viking/Seaver Books; Nov. 1979. The Alms Race: The Impact of American Voluntary Aid Abroad. Random House; May 1976.

         - Articles and essays for TIME, and for journals ranging from Foreign Affairs to the Wall Street Journal.  Cover story on the demoralization of American forces in Vietnam for Saturday Review in Dec. 1971.

 

           Environment:

         - The Winds of Change: Climate, Weather, and the Destruction of Civilizations. Simon & Schuster, Feb. 2006. “Seeing the Forest: Conservation on a Continental Scale,” Foreign Affairs; July/August 2004. Numerous cover stories and essays for TIME. Helped conceive TIME's celebrated, 1989 Planet-of-the-Year, special issue on ``Endangered Earth,'' TIME International's special issue," Our Precious Planet," and wrote major articles for both issues. Wrote main article for TIME's first global special issue in 2000, "How to Save the Earth." WroteSmithsonian’s May 2003 cover story, “The Nature of Cuba.”

 

         Animal Intelligence and Language

         Books:

         - The Octopus and the Orangutan: More Tales of Animal Intrigue, Intelligence, and Ingenuity. E.P. Dutton, Aug. 2002.  The Parrot's Lament: Tales of Animal Intrigue, Intelligence and Ingenuity. E.P. Dutton, Oct. 1999. Silent Partners: The Legacy of the Ape Language Experiments. TIMES Books; April 1986. Apes, Men, and Language. Saturday Review Press/Dutton; Jan. 1975. Soft: Penguin, Feb. 1976, revised edition, 1981.

          Major Articles:

         "Can Animals Think" (cover story for TIME), and "Apes and Humans" (cover story forNational Geographic)

 

        

         Business and the Economy:

         Books:

         The Mind of Wall Street, Leon Levy with Eugene Linden. Public Affairs, Oct. 2002.

         -  Articles on the emergence of the distressed securities industry for TIME and FORTUNE.  Essays on the perils of the integrated global market for TIME and MSNBC.  Major article on the makings of the Asian meltdown as part of cover package forTIME InternationalSeveral articles on entrepreneurial thinking while a senior writer at INC. in 1984, including the centerpiece article of INC.'s fifth anniversary special edition.

 

 

         Awards and Citations:

         2007: Grantham Prize Special Award of Merit.  2001: Poynter Fellow in Journalism, Yale University. 1997: finalist, John Oakes Award. 1996: Overseas Press Club Citation for Excellence; Lowell Thomas Award. 1995: Genesis Award; honorable mention, National Press Club Robert Kozick Award. 1994: Genesis Award; Harry Chapin Media Award; Population Institute Global Media Award. 1991: Finalist, National Magazine Award; Walter Sullivan Award.

 

          Selected List of Keynotes and Major Speeches:

         The Library of Congress, Woodrow Wilson Institute, Carnegie Council, U.S. State Department, Senior Seminar at the Foreign Service Institute, Saint John the Divine, the CIA Transnational Issues Group, LeNS International Conference on Law Enforcement and National Security (keynote), the 2001 Democratic Senatorial Retreat, 7th International Conference on Environmental Enrichment (keynote), Cooper Union

 

 

BOARDS

  • RARE Center for Tropical Conservation, 1997 to 2002
  • World Wildlife Fund, National Council 2003 – 2009
  • Wildlife Conservation Society, Education Committee, 2000- 2007
  • The Green Guide, 2000 - 2008

         -    Golden Books Family Entertainment. Inc., August, 1999 -2001  

  • PGI Inc. 2003 – 2008
  • Evercom Inc. 2003-2005
  • Cibus, 2004 – Present
  • Syratech, 2005 – 2009
  • Insight Health Services, 2007 – 2010
  • Haights Cross, 2010-Present

 

AFFILIATIONS

 

         -    The Century Association

  • PEN
  • The  Katoomba Group
  • Associate Fellow, Timothy Dwight College, Yale University

 

PRESENT EMPLOYMENT:

Chief Investment Strategist, Bennett Management (a family of investment funds specializing in distress and bankruptcies)

 

PREVIOUS EMPLOYMENT:

         Contributor TIME, 1995-2001; Senior writer at TIME, 1987-1995; senior writer at INC., 1984; executive editor at Technology Illustrated, 1983

        

         Education: Yale University, BA

 

                 

 

 

 

                          

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

contact Eugene Linden

Short Take

GOP Scare Stories Point to the Real National Emergency

A couple of months ago, in the days before President Trump declared a national emergency to try and circumvent Congress and fund his Wall, a number of Republicans scrambled to articulate sufficiently horrifying examples of how others might misuse those powers. Florida Congressman Matt Goetz offered a nightmare scenario in which a Democratic President forcing elementary schools across the country to build transgender bathrooms. Florida senator Marco Rubio went on CNBC and asserted that the true nightmare was that, “Tomorrow, the national emergency might be, you know, climate change…” Permit me to rephrase this: for Rubio, the problem with Trump using emergency powers was not that he was using a phony emergency as a pretext, but that in the future Democrats might use those powers to try to deal with an actual emergency.

That’s what’s truly scary. Rubio’s example reveals his assumption that Congress can block action on climate change going forward, forcing a President to assume emergency powers. The Wall Street Journal editorial page also chimed in, warning that Trump invoking a national emergency might embolden a future president to use these powers to deal with rising carbon emissions, again implying that other means of dealing with rising emissions could be blocked.

OK, let’s go with this. Imagine the circumstances in which some future President thought it necessary to use a declaration of national emergency to deal with climate change. Maybe it would be a collapse in the housing market as sea level rise, super storms, and wildfires made trillions of dollars in property uninsurable, and thus ineligible for mortgages. Or perhaps it would be the banking and financial crisis attendant to these developments.

It would also imply that the public was not yet concerned enough to elect a Congress that would take action to contain the threat. It’s true that there has been a rapid uptick in concern about climate change as determined by polling, but a recent study by the Energy Policy Institute found that while 57% of those polled people thought climate change was sufficiently threatening that they would spend $1 a month to avert it, most would still balk at $10 a month. 

To put this in perspective, the amount the U.S. spent on defense and intelligence last year equates to roughly $650 a month per household and that figure does not include spending at the state and local level for police. The amount the U.S. spent last year just to fight ISIS amounted to $40 a month per household. Is ISIS, which has never successfully mounted a mass attack on U.S. soil, really 40 times the threat that climate change poses?

Part of the problem is that the threat of climate change remains something that is still treated as a matter of belief; i.e. whether one “believes” in global warming (and recent polling reported that even today, only 52% of Republicans agree that global warming is happening). Given that climate change is staring (most of) us in the face, we should be past that point, but we’re not. This cognitive dissonance will ultimately resolve itself, however, because whether you “believe” in climate change becomes irrelevant if sea level rise and storms render your house unsaleable.

Still, the Trump administration continues to fight a rear-guard action, pushing back on its own agencies that have warned about the threat.  The White House wants to convene a 12-member panel to review whether climate change is a national security threat – despite the assertions that it does threaten national security that come from intelligence agencies and defense departments around the world in the form of reports as recent as the Department of Defense report on its vulnerability to climate change this January and dating back to the 1990s. 

The real purpose of the panel becomes apparent from its membership. One of the leaders will be William Happer, who serves on the National Security Council and who has argued publicly that climate isn’t changing and that additional CO2 in the atmosphere will be beneficial rather than harmful. If this panel attaches the prestige of the White House to a report pooh-poohing global warming it could sew further confusion in the public and reduce any sense of urgency. More likely though, it will backfire as so many Trump initiatives do. Rather than undermining a sense of urgency, a clown car convention of fossil fuel apologists could undermine the prestige of the White House.

 Now, the Trump administration has also targeted the climate assessments produced by its own agencies. As assessments of the future impacts of climate change have become ever-more dire, the administration’s response is to cut off any forecasts beyond 2040. Because of the lags in the climate system, this would eliminate many of the worst scenarios as many impacts accelerate in the second half of this century. As the global scientific community will not go along with this willful blindness, this initiative will only further underscore the impression that the White House is more interested in propaganda than science.

As for the rest of us, those of us who see the changes that that climate is working in the world around us, we can only hope that some future President has the guts to declare a national emergency if things worsen and Congress continues to abnegate its responsibilities.



read more
  designed and maintained by g r a v i t y s w i t c h , i n c .
Eugene Linden. all rights reserved.